In one of his latest posts called The Displacement Lesson, Gil Student from the Hirhurim Blog (a blog that I respect BTW!) asks a great question on Genesis 47:21 (“And as for the people, he moved them into the cities, from one end of the borders of Egypt to the other end.”):
“This displacement of vast numbers of people is perplexing. The Gemara (Chullin 60b) explains that he did it so the Egyptians could not call the Jewish people "exiles", since they were all displaced. “
Typical Gemora answer, what can you say. He continues:
“Rashi (Gen. 47:21) expands on this, that his intent was to remove shame from his brothers. He resettled the Egyptians in order to protect his brother's honors.
The Keli Yakar (ad loc.) asks a question whose importance is only eclipsed by the answer: How is that moral? How could Yosef force so many people to leave their homes just to protect his brothers? This seems quite morally problematic.
Great question, now see the answer given by the Keli Yakar:
The Keli Yakar reframes the earlier explanations as follows. Yosef was trying to teach the Egyptians an important lesson, to instill in them the need to empathize with strangers. It is part of human nature to fail to understand the plight of the outsider, the people who are lacking support structures and contacts within the system. Such people are easily oppressed, even unintentionally. Therefore, Yosef displaced the Egyptians so they all learn what it is like to be an outsider. This, he hoped, would prevent them from oppressing the recent immigrants. Sadly, it failed.”
As often seen in parshanut, the question is way better than the answer, nevertheless it is accepted as a valid answer!
What the Keli Yakar is really saying is that it is OK to go ahead with something as immoral as forcibly displacing entire families and communities (trample on their basic human rights!) just to instill in them the need to be more sensitive towards strangers. Can you feel the contradiction resonating in your bladder?!
If you ask me, Yosef was just trying to exercise control over his serfs after they had no more money to pay to him for food, so that he / Pharao had absolute power over their own people.
But then again, this explanation would have to be discarded, because after all, we are talking about Yoisif Hatzaddik…
I have a much better answer. Yosef was trying to deal with a famine. He needed to distribute huge quantities of food in a time and place without roads, trucks, railroads, etc. The best way to do this would be to gather the people into population centers – cities. Surely it is moral to temporarily displace people in order to feed them? I think the phrase, “from one end of the borders of Egypt to the other end,” could be understood to mean he did this throughout Egypt, not that he moved families from one end of Egypt to the other.
ReplyDeleteThis is just speculation, mind you, but at least it makes sense. That the miforshim explain Yosef’s actions only in terms of their effects on the Bnei Yisroel – his brothers – is telling.
G*3: I like it!
ReplyDeleteI think it's pretty clear that Joseph was doing his job- to consolidate Pharoah's power- and doing it well.
ReplyDeleteWhat surprises me is that the commentators see it as beneficial to the Bnei Israel, when it would be so much easier to deduce the opposite - that in fact it led the egyptians harbored great resentment against joseph's people.
I guess not so surprised, since I should remember from my youth how conditioned they are to interpret everything the jewish biblical characters do favorably.
ReplyDeleteAnyway loved this post. I seldom get to analyze Torah with objective people. Keep em coming.
Kisarita: you are so right. And thanks for the encouragement! :)
ReplyDeleteThe Keli Yakar's answer is the best Torah answer.
ReplyDeleteYHVH is portrayed as portrayed as doing essentially the same thing to Bnei Yisrael.
Any other answer would be a hiddush, requiring "...something as immoral as forcibly displacing entire families and communities..." for a different goal. Why would we think this other goal was worth this particular cost?
I just want to point out a fun fact about this verse: apparently in both the Samaritan text and Septuagint (the old Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible) Joseph did not move the people to the cities, he made them slaves. (Source: the footnotes to the Swedish Bible-translation who prefers the reading that he enslaved the people.)
ReplyDeleteder yoisaif hatzadik is nisht geshtoigen un nusht gefloigen, so i fail to grasp the kashye
ReplyDelete